Mainie Jellett and Evie Hone: The Art of Friendship

A kaleidoscope of colour through which the history of modernism is refracted, this exhibition brings to light the creative benefits of long-lasting friendship, collaboration and experimentation

Mainie Jellett and Evie Hone: The Art of Friendship, installation view, National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin 10 April – 10 August 2025.

National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin
10 April – 10 August 2025

by CELIA DELAHUNT

Histories of modernist art increasingly emphasise the networks and collaborations that underpinned this international phenomenon. Yet it is still refreshing to see an exhibition that foregrounds friendship, encouragement and common purpose in the interactions between modernist artists, rather than their emotional dramas or rivalries. This is the case in Mainie Jellett and Evie Hone: The Art of Friendship, which charts how these two artists developed a visual language of abstraction in Paris in the 1920s that continued to echo throughout their careers. As one of the show’s curator’s, Brendan Rooney, explains: “Their story is one of convergence and divergence over time, but it was a slow separation. And there are always these indications of their shared history, their shared experience in Paris.”

Having met at art school in London, Jellett (1897-1944) and Hone (1894-1955) went to Paris in the early 1920s and presented themselves at the studio of the abstract artist Albert Gleizes. They insisted he take them on as his students, refusing to take no for an answer when he tried to resist. Their impressive confidence bears itself out in the paintings we see in the first room of the show: in pursuit of “extreme cubism”, their works layered abstracted blocks of colour and linear contours, the picture plane flattened, splintered and shifting in paintings such as Hone’s 4 Elements (1924) and Jellett’s 6 Elements(1926). The pair worked to refine the principles of abstraction that Gleizes had begun to champion, and their subsequent closeness in style and technique can be seen in this initial space. “We were hoping that when people walked into this room, they couldn’t immediately tell who had painted what,” Rooney says.Yet on close inspection, the differences in handling and composition become clear. Jellett is more controlled and precise, while in works such as the undated Compositionwe see what Rooney calls Hone’s “more impulsive” tendency to go beyond the limitations of Gleizes’s approach by reworking parts of the canvas and disregarding concerns about cramped compositions.

Evie Hone. Daniel in the Lions' Den, from the West Cross, Monasterboice Monastery, County Louth; Grazing Cattle (on verso), 1940s. Ink and watercolour on paper, 37 x 23.8 cm. © Geraldine Hone, Kate Hone and the FNCI. Photo, National Gallery of Ireland.

Jellett and Hone’s experiments in pure abstraction inevitably ran their course and, as the 1920s wore on, they began to introduce figuration into their work. This exhibition argues, however, that they never left abstraction behind. This is seen most strikingly in the works they made on religious subjects. A group of four depictions of the Madonna and Child made by Jellett between 1932 and 1940 highlight her use of this subject to reflect her own faith and to continue her experiments with colour, line, shape and composition. Presented together on one wall, they each appear as permutations of one another. Nearby, the influence of early Italian Renaissance painting is prominent in the cool tones and geometrically arranged forms of Hone’s Composition and Jellett’s Homage to Fra Angelico, both from 1928. Their interest in religious painting was not only grounded in their Catholic beliefs, nor was it solely a consequence of their knowledge of art history. It was born from the connection between spirituality and creativity that their work seemed to enshrine. As Rooney observes: “I think they probably had rather romanticised ideas – certainly Hone did – about the character of figures like Fra Angelico, who were unknowable because they were historical figures, but they wanted to know them. And I think Hone liked to believe that great art was made by great people, so she aspired to that herself, and they lived extremely dignified and upstanding lives themselves.”

Evie Hone. The Crucifixion (top), Melchizedek, the Last Supper and the Sacrifice of Isaac (bottom), (for the East window, Eton College Chapel, Berkshire, 1952), 1950. © Geraldine Hone, Kate Hone and the FNCI. Photo, National Gallery of Ireland.

It is in Hone’s work in stained glass that we see the next manifestation of her earlier cubist practice. A whole room is devoted to these pieces, which glow beautifully from black walls, their luminosity emphasising the richness of their colour and the graphic boldness of their design. Hone carried out huge ecclesiastical commissions, for instance for the east window of Eton College Chapel, as well as some secular projects, and this range is represented here by preparatory works or small sections of the whole. An adjacent room reveals further divergences from painting that the two artists undertook, in textile, theatre and poster design. Influenced by the Paris-based textile artist Eileen Gray, the rugs and screen designed by Jellett, for instance, bear the cubist layering of forms and dotted, lined patterns seen in her Parisian paintings.

Evie Hone. Heads of Two Apostles, c1952. Stained glass, 86 x 61 cm. © Geraldine Hone, Kate Hone and the FNCI. Photo © National Gallery of Ireland.

Though each of the works is stunningly presented and carefully paired, it might have been interesting to see some archival material that brought the artists and their relationship to life. Without this, the exhibition feels like a very “art historical” presentation of two vibrant and creatively generous individuals, whose presence could have been conjured in greater detail as viewers moved through the show. Despite this, one of the strengths of this exhibition is its underplaying of questions of identity. Jellett and Hone were female Irish artists with deep faith, and Hone had suffered from polio which left her with physical challenges, including in one of her arms. These contextual details are interesting, and in places important, but they are not the main driver of the show. Rooney says: “We tried not to stress the Irishness, the religiosity, or the fact that they were women. They all informed the story, but you can fall very quickly into the trap of seeing it as ‘female art’, whatever that is – it doesn’t exist.” In this way, the art on the walls speaks for itself, its power retained in not being explained.

We see the importance of this in the last room, dedicated to the artists’ final years. In 1940, Jellett produced what is arguably a political work, The Land, Éire, not long after the 1937 ratification of the Bunreacht na hÉireann (Irish Constitution) that confirmed Éire as the newly independent state’s official name. Yet Jellett’s painting retains its commitment to abstraction above all else. While hinting at a pastoral beauty in the face of increasing industrialisation, it is first and foremost an exercise in the fluidity and modulation of colour and line.

Mainie Jellett. Achill Horses, 1941. Oil on canvas, 61 x 92 cm. Photo, National Gallery of Ireland.

Hone outlived Jellett by 11 years and her final decade saw her producing more traditional-looking sketches and paintings of the landscape surrounding her home in the Dublin countryside, as well as abroad. The sketches hang opposite Jellett’s The Land, Éire, next to the controlled yet curving lines of the horses and sea in Jellett’s Achill Horses (1941), and near to the jostling forms Hone presents in A Landscape with a Tree (1943). The collective effect is to offer a final comparison between the two artists and friends. They went their own ways in some respects after their time in Gleizes’s studio, pursuing new mediums and forms as the years passed, but in the end, they will always have Paris.

Evie Hone. A Landscape with a Tree, 1943. Oil on board, 69 x 69 cm. © Geraldine Hone, Kate Hone and the FNCI. Photo, National Gallery of Ireland.